The damaging logic behind Vladimir Putin’s “partial mobilisation” speech

Immediately (21 September), precisely seven months after he made a televised deal with foreshadowing the invasion of Ukraine, Vladimir Putin has given one other speech to his nation doubling down on the conflict. The Russian president introduced a “partial mobilisation”, with the armed forces calling up its reserves, on the spurious floor that they might guarantee territorial integrity and shield”folks in Russian-occupied territories of Ukraine – territories that can maintain doubtful votes on becoming a member of Russia within the coming days. Putin additionally issued a barely veiled nuclear menace to Ukraine and to the West: “If its territorial integrity is threatened Russia will use all of the means at its disposal. This isn’t a bluff.” Like his deal with in February, three days earlier than his forces invaded Ukraine, the speech signalled an alarming escalation.  

It has been clear for a while that Putin is working out of choices to keep away from a humiliating defeat in Ukraine. His forces are quickly dropping floor within the nation’s north-east and coming beneath renewed strain on the southern and japanese fronts. Some analysts puzzled whether or not the astonishing success of the Ukrainian counteroffensive in latest weeks may lastly clarify to Putin that he can not win the conflict, and that he ought to search, at a minimal, a brief halt to the preventing. This week it grew to become clear that may not occur.

On 20 September, in a clearly co-ordinated sequence of occasions, pro-Kremlin officers in 4 occupied areas of Ukraine – Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia – introduced plans to carry referendums on becoming a member of Russia from 23 to 27 September. They ignored the truth that Russian forces don’t absolutely management any of those areas, or that the polls could be unlawful beneath worldwide legislation. In some instances the voting is anticipated to happen on-line, presumably to make the outcomes simpler to falsify.  

Earlier than Putin’s speech Western governments made clear they might not recognise the referendums. Jake Sullivan, the US nationwide safety adviser, instantly rejected the deliberate votes as a “sham” and mentioned that the US would “by no means recognise this territory as something apart from part of Ukraine”. Emmanuel Macron, the French president, referred to as the plans a “parody” and mentioned the outcomes wouldn’t be recognised by the worldwide group. “If the Donbas referendum thought wasn’t so tragic it could be humorous,” he mentioned.

But there’s a sinister logic behind the thought from Moscow’s perspective. By going via the charade of holding these votes and annexing these areas, as he did with Crimea in 2014, Putin will then have the ability declare, nevertheless cynically, that any additional assaults on this territory can be handled as an assault on Russia itself and topic to essentially the most severe penalties. His pointed assertion on 21 September about Russia utilizing “all of the means at its disposal” clearly laid this out. (The previous Russian president Dmitry Medvedev, who traded locations with Putin from 2008 to 2012, and is now the deputy chairman of the Russia’s safety council, has additionally beforehand warned of a “Judgement Day” response if Ukrainian forces goal the Black Sea peninsula of Crimea, invoking the specter of nuclear weapons.) Russian army doctrine permits for the usage of nuclear weapons in a scenario the place the state is deemed to be dealing with an existential menace from typical weapons – though it isn’t clear whether or not an assault on Russian-claimed territory in Ukraine would meet this bar.

Choose and enter your electronic mail deal with

Morning Name



Fast and important information to home and world politics from the New Statesman’s politics group.

The Crash



A weekly e-newsletter serving to you match collectively the items of the worldwide financial slowdown.

World Assessment



The New Statesman’s world affairs e-newsletter, each Monday and Friday.

The New Statesman Day by day



The most effective of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox each weekday morning.

Inexperienced Instances



The New Statesman’s weekly surroundings electronic mail on the politics, enterprise and tradition of the local weather and nature crises – in your inbox each Thursday.

The Tradition Edit



Our weekly tradition e-newsletter – from books and artwork to popular culture and memes – despatched each Friday.

Weekly Highlights



A weekly round-up of a few of the finest articles featured in the newest subject of the New Statesman, despatched every Saturday.

Concepts and Letters



A e-newsletter showcasing the best writing from the concepts part and the NS archive, masking political concepts, philosophy, criticism and mental historical past – despatched each Wednesday.

Occasions and Presents



Signal as much as obtain data concerning NS occasions, subscription gives & product updates.






  • Administration / Workplace
  • Arts and Tradition
  • Board Member
  • Enterprise / Company Providers
  • Shopper / Buyer Providers
  • Communications
  • Development, Works, Engineering
  • Training, Curriculum and Instructing
  • Atmosphere, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Administration and Upkeep
  • Finance Administration
  • Well being – Medical and Nursing Administration
  • HR, Coaching and Organisational Improvement
  • Data and Communications Expertise
  • Data Providers, Statistics, Data, Archives
  • Infrastructure Administration – Transport, Utilities
  • Authorized Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Administration
  • Administration
  • Advertising
  • OH&S, Danger Administration
  • Operations Administration
  • Planning, Coverage, Technique
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Internet
  • Initiatives, Packages and Advisors
  • Property, Property and Fleet Administration
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Buying and Procurement
  • High quality Administration
  • Science and Technical Analysis and Improvement
  • Safety and Legislation Enforcement
  • Service Supply
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Journey, Lodging, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Neighborhood / Social Providers



Nonetheless, maybe Putin believes that the menace alone will trigger Ukraine’s supporters within the West to baulk and put strain on Kyiv to sluggish its advance. Tatyana Stanovaya, founding father of the Russian political evaluation agency R Politik, described the Kremlin’s resolution to carry votes and transfer to annex the territories as an “completely unequivocal ultimatum from Russia to Ukraine and the West”. As she summed it up, “Both Ukraine is retreating, or a nuclear conflict.” 

Content material from our companions

Why competition is the key to customer satisfaction

High streets remain vitally important to local communities

The future of gas

On the identical day that the deliberate referendums had been introduced, the Russian parliament handed a invoice to extend punishments for offences akin to desertion or refusing to combat throughout a mobilisation. This has stoked rumours that Putin is making ready to draft extra Russian residents to spice up his flagging forces in Ukraine, though as lately as final week his spokesman mentioned nationwide mobilisation was not into consideration, and such a transfer would carry vital home political dangers. Although his announcement on 21 September does contradict his spokesman, by solely declaring a “partial mobilisation” of military reserves, Putin is clearly nonetheless cautious of triggering backlash at house.

Putin’s unlawful annexation of Crimea in 2014 was celebrated in Russia as a political and strategic victory. Even the late Soviet chief Mikhail Gorbachev, who had criticised Putin’s authoritarian rule, described it on the time as a “blissful occasion”. The gambit secured management of the strategically vital port of Sevastopol, the place the Russian Black Sea Fleet is headquartered, and which Moscow had beforehand been pressured to lease from Kyiv. Again then, the Ukrainian army was a fraction of its present power and, after a quick stand-off, Ukrainian troops on the peninsula handed over their bases with no combat. The response to any try to assert extra Ukrainian territory this time can be very completely different.

Arriving in New York for the UN Common Meeting the Ukrainian overseas minister, Dmytro Kuleba, referred to as the plan to stage votes an “act of desperation”. He could also be proper, however this doesn’t make the times and weeks forward any much less ominous. Assuming that Ukraine retains preventing and calls Putin’s bluff, it’s unclear what occurs subsequent. Essentially the most harmful section of this conflict continues to be forward.

[See also: The UN General Assembly will underline Russia’s isolation] 

Leave a Reply