Is Putin going to start out a nuclear battle?

This morning (21 September), the Russian president Vladimir Putin made a speech through which he introduced army mobilisation – a transfer that can, I think, worsen reasonably than clear up the issues confronted by Russian forces on the entrance.

His assertion on nuclear weapons, nonetheless, has captured probably the most consideration. That is what he mentioned:

“Nuclear blackmail additionally got here into play. We’re speaking not solely concerning the shelling of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear energy plant, inspired by the West, which threatens a nuclear disaster, but additionally concerning the statements of some high-ranking representatives of the main Nato states concerning the chance and admissibility of utilizing weapons of mass destruction, nuclear weapons in opposition to Russia. To those that enable themselves such statements in opposition to Russia, I wish to remind you that our nation additionally has numerous technique of destruction, and in some parts extra fashionable than the Nato international locations. And if the territorial integrity of our nation is threatened… we will definitely use all of the means at our disposal to guard Russia and our folks. It’s not a bluff.

“The residents of Russia can make sure that the territorial integrity of our Motherland, our independence and freedom shall be ensured – I emphasise this once more – with all of the means at our disposal. And those that try to blackmail us with nuclear weapons ought to know that the wind rose may also flip of their path.”

This assertion is about deterrence. It got here on the finish of the speech as a warning to the West about additional escalation. There’s a query as as to if the sham referendums proposed to assist the annexation of the assorted occupied territories of Ukraine shall be backed by this deterrent risk. He could also be content material to go away this ambiguous, however so was the assertion on these referendums:

Choose and enter your e mail tackle

Morning Name



Fast and important information to home and world politics from the New Statesman’s politics group.

The Crash



A weekly publication serving to you match collectively the items of the worldwide financial slowdown.

World Overview



The New Statesman’s world affairs publication, each Monday and Friday.

The New Statesman Every day



The very best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox each weekday morning.

Inexperienced Occasions



The New Statesman’s weekly setting e mail on the politics, enterprise and tradition of the local weather and nature crises – in your inbox each Thursday.

The Tradition Edit



Our weekly tradition publication – from books and artwork to popular culture and memes – despatched each Friday.

Weekly Highlights



A weekly round-up of among the finest articles featured in the newest challenge of the New Statesman, despatched every Saturday.

Concepts and Letters



A publication showcasing the best writing from the concepts part and the NS archive, protecting political concepts, philosophy, criticism and mental historical past – despatched each Wednesday.

Occasions and Presents



Signal as much as obtain info relating to NS occasions, subscription gives & product updates.






  • Administration / Workplace
  • Arts and Tradition
  • Board Member
  • Enterprise / Company Providers
  • Consumer / Buyer Providers
  • Communications
  • Development, Works, Engineering
  • Schooling, Curriculum and Instructing
  • Setting, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Administration and Upkeep
  • Finance Administration
  • Well being – Medical and Nursing Administration
  • HR, Coaching and Organisational Growth
  • Info and Communications Expertise
  • Info Providers, Statistics, Data, Archives
  • Infrastructure Administration – Transport, Utilities
  • Authorized Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Administration
  • Administration
  • Advertising
  • OH&S, Danger Administration
  • Operations Administration
  • Planning, Coverage, Technique
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Net
  • Tasks, Applications and Advisors
  • Property, Property and Fleet Administration
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Buying and Procurement
  • High quality Administration
  • Science and Technical Analysis and Growth
  • Safety and Regulation Enforcement
  • Service Supply
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Journey, Lodging, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Neighborhood / Social Providers



“The parliaments of the folks’s republics of Donbas, in addition to the military-civilian administrations of the Kherson and the Zaporizhzhia areas, determined to carry referendums on the way forward for these territories and requested us to assist such a step. Let me emphasise that we’ll do our greatest to make sure protected situations for holding the referendum. To allow folks to precise their will. And we are going to assist the choice about their future, which shall be made by nearly all of residents of the Donetsk and Luhansk Folks’s Republics, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson areas.”

Content material from our companions

Why economic growth needs the right leaders

Why ports are the gateway to growth

We are living longer than our predecessors – policy must catch up

No hyperlink was made within the speech between this promise and the nuclear risk. Solely Luhansk is near being absolutely occupied, and that’s now being contested once more. No new crimson line has but to be established there. If he wished to guard these good points with nuclear threats, earlier than they’re taken again by Ukrainian forces, he would want to have made this express.

[See also: The dangerous logic behind Vladimir Putin’s “partial mobilisation” speech]

Supreme leaders obtain their positions after which maintain them by shaping occasions to their benefit. It’s pure, subsequently, to imagine that even once they seem to have misplaced management, they’ll discover a approach to regain it. This assumption is behind the frequent chorus, even heard from individuals who would dearly like Putin to fail, that the Russian president “won’t enable it to occur”. That even at this late stage he’ll discover one thing that can flip the tide of the battle. No matter that one thing is, it should transcend including to the damage and distress already brought on – which we all know he can do. It should additionally stave off Russia’s defeat, and that’s one other matter. Subsequently, along with speculating about what Putin would possibly do subsequent, we additionally have to ask what good it would do him.

On Friday 16 September, Putin spoke on the conclusion of a diplomatic convention held in Uzbekistan. This convention was most memorable for proof of Russia’s rising isolation, even amongst international locations which may have been anticipated to be extra sympathetic. As there have been seen indicators of Central Asian states distancing themselves farther from Russia, Putin was obliged to acknowledge that each the Chinese language president Xi Jinping and the Indian prime minister Narendra Modi had considerations concerning the battle.

Putin sought to elucidate how he would win the battle. Requested concerning the Ukrainian counteroffensive he mentioned: “Let’s see the way it unfolds and the way it ends.” Then, requested if the battle plan wanted to be adjusted, he confused Russia’s minimal reasonably than most aims: “The fundamental objective is to liberate the total territory of Donbas.” It is a narrower focus than the one with which he began the invasion, and the one which he was nonetheless toying with a couple of weeks in the past. He reported that the work to realize this goal “continues regardless of these counteroffensive makes an attempt by the Ukrainian military… The overall workers considers some aims essential, some issues secondary, however the primary activity stays unchanged, and it’s being carried out.” Maybe he appreciates that Kharkiv is misplaced and Kherson might go quickly. Actually it informs the Russian offensive in Donetsk, which nonetheless continues, very a lot as earlier than, regardless of the setbacks elsewhere.

[See also: What is Russia doing with Ukraine’s nuclear power plant?]

Whereas the West worries that Russia would possibly resort to escalation in response to Ukrainian advances, Putin claims to see it the opposite means spherical. On 16 September, he spoke of “makes an attempt to perpetrate terrorist assaults and injury our civilian infrastructure”, referring presumably to occasional Ukrainian assaults on the Russian oblast of Belgorod, simply over the border, and of Crimea.

He added: “Terrorist assaults are a critical matter. In reality, it’s about utilizing terrorist strategies. We see this within the killing of officers within the liberated territories, we even see makes an attempt at perpetrating terrorist assaults within the Russian Federation, together with – I’m not certain if this was made public – makes an attempt to hold out terrorist assaults close to our nuclear amenities, nuclear energy crops within the Russian Federation. I’m not even speaking concerning the Zaporizhzhia nuclear energy plant.

“We’re monitoring the scenario and can do our greatest to stop a adverse situation from unfolding. We are going to reply in the event that they fail to understand that these approaches are unacceptable. They’re, in truth, no completely different than terrorist assaults.”

Considerably bizarrely for the top of a rustic that has been systematically terrorising folks in occupied territories and launching missiles frequently in opposition to Ukraine’s civilian infrastructure, he insisted that Russia had been “fairly restrained in our response, however that won’t final eternally”. Noting that “a few delicate blows” had been delivered in opposition to Ukraine, he added: “Properly, what about that? We are going to assume that these are warning strikes. If the scenario continues to develop on this means, the reply shall be extra critical.” This was apparently a reference to the Russian strikes that adopted Ukraine’s profitable offensive in Kharkiv, which brought on widespread blackouts and broken a dam within the southern metropolis of Kryvyi Rih. The reference to additional assaults might have been meant to keep up the concern of nuclear weapons getting used, it was not express and Russia nonetheless has the means to inflict such injury with out resorting to those weapons.

Nuclear use

But the nuclear challenge now comes up steadily. For officers and commentators in Kyiv and Washington which can be asking what Putin would possibly do subsequent, it’s most likely the matter for the best hypothesis. Rose Gottemoeller, a former prime US nuclear policymaker and Nato’s deputy secretary basic till 2019, advised the BBC of her concern that “Putin and his coterie” will “strike again now in actually unpredictable ways in which might even contain weapons of mass destruction”. She didn’t count on ICBM (intercontinental ballistic missile) launches, however probably one other type of nuclear sabre-rattling – “a single strike over the Black Sea, or maybe a strike at a Ukrainian army facility” to “strike terror not solely into the hearts of the Ukrainians” and its allies.

This isn’t a chance that ought to be cavalierly dismissed. Russia has considerable shops of nuclear weapons, in a wide range of sizes and shapes, and Putin is perhaps determined sufficient to make use of them. As a result of he has already executed some actually silly issues who can say for certain that he gained’t do something even stupider. This chance is just not negligible, and that’s worrying sufficient in itself. However it isn’t sufficient to reply the query of whether or not he would possibly give a nuclear order by referencing an unstable psychological state, or with assumptions that as a result of he’s being humiliated he would possibly reply with a tantrum to finish all tantrums. We have to think about precisely what issues – army and/or political – that this would possibly clear up. Matthew Kroenig, writing for the US international affairs assume tank Atlantic Council, has warned {that a} Russian nuclear strike “might trigger a humanitarian disaster, deal a crippling blow to the Ukrainian army, divide the Western alliance, and compel Kyiv to sue for peace”. However will it?

To behave this fashion would break a “taboo” that has developed round nuclear use because the solely time they had been utilized in anger in August 1945. It was a taboo that Putin himself acknowledged with the US president Joe Biden in June 2021, once they reaffirmed the statement affirmed by presidents Mikhail Gorbachev and Ronald Reagan in 1985: “Nuclear battle can’t be gained and mustn’t ever be fought.”

It might additionally characterize an excessive model of the behaviour his forces have already been following. Russia is just not wanting having the weapons to trigger damage and struggling, and it has proven no reluctance in utilizing them. Ukrainian cities and cities have been pummelled by Russian shells, rockets and missiles, directed in opposition to residential buildings, factories, transportation hubs, energy crops and far more.

Russia’s marketing campaign has seen thresholds of violence being handed with disturbing regularity. Along with long-distance strikes, there have been experiences of extra intimate crimes after the occupying forces have left – of tortures, murders, rapes, abductions and looting. If these had been speculated to have a strategic goal, and should not simply random acts of cruelty (some might come into this class), then one supposes the intention is to make the Ukrainians concede. In observe, the impact has been the other. It has hardened Ukraine’s resolve and made its folks much more decided to rid their nation of the Russian presence. Regardless of all they’ve been by means of, Ukrainians have proven extraordinary ranges of resilience, unity and dedication. When requested, the Ukrainian authorities says that even nuclear use would have the identical impact.

It’s particularly essential to notice that simply because nuclear weapons haven’t been employed, it doesn’t imply that they’ve had no affect on the course of this battle. They’ve performed an essential deterrent position. Simply earlier than the invasion started, Putin took half in an annual drill involving Russian missiles. Then, when he introduced the “particular operation” on 24 February, he remarked  that “whoever tries to hinder us” will face “penalties that you’ve got by no means confronted in your historical past”. Three days later he publicly ordered his defence minister, Sergei Shoigu, and the chief of the final workers, Valery Gerasimov, “to switch the military’s deterrence forces to a particular mode of fight responsibility”. This didn’t quantity to a lot in observe: the purpose was to underline a deterrence risk.

The risk was directed in direction of Nato international locations which may have been desirous about instantly intervening to assist Ukraine. Threats of this kind had been made in 2014 after Russia annexed Crimea. Again then Putin acknowledged that different international locations “ought to perceive it’s finest to not mess with us”, including that “Russia is likely one of the main nuclear powers”. At the moment, as now, Russian media broadcast common, lurid descriptions of the horrible issues Russia would do to any international locations that interfered, neglecting to say what these international locations might do in return. The goal was to current Russia as a rustic with limitless energy, with the desire to make use of it, and with little sense of proportion, in order that any minor provocation might lead to terror raining down on the perpetrator.

[See also: What is Vladimir Putin’s next move?]

These threats had been geared to reinforcing Putin’s unique message. Take the contributions of Andrei Gurulyov, a lieutenant basic, member of the Duma and common media commentator. He was instantly concerned in Russia actions within the jap Ukrainian area of Donbas in 2014 and 2015, and he’s one thing of a charmer. The Ukrainian authorities launched an intercepted name from him on 28 February 2022, simply after the invasion began, issuing orders to set Ukrainian households on fireplace. He has a factor about destroying the UK. On state tv in August, when requested if Britain was readying for battle with Russia, Gurulyov replied that this was already the case. Russia was preventing each the UK and the US in Ukraine.

“Let’s make it tremendous easy,” he mentioned on Russian TV. “Two ships, 50 launches of Zircon [missiles] – and there’s not a single energy station left within the UK. Fifty extra Zircons – and your complete port infrastructure is gone. Yet one more – and we overlook concerning the British Isles. A Third World nation, destroyed and fallen aside as a result of Scotland and Wales would depart. This could be the tip of the British Crown. And they’re fearful of it.”

Extra lately, Gurulyov famous that Biden had warned Russia in opposition to utilizing nuclear weapons in Ukraine. He noticed that “we might use them however not in Ukraine”. This time he made specific point out of strikes in opposition to decision-making centres in Berlin, threatening Germany with whole chaos, alongside along with his acquainted theme of turning the British Isles right into a “martian desert”. He added, confidently, that the US wouldn’t reply. All this was linked to stopping Nato getting instantly concerned. “They need to tuck their tails in and sustain yapping.”

Strip away the absurd rhetoric and braggadocio and it’s clear the main focus stays on deterring Nato international locations, now together with the availability of Ukraine with the means to mount deep strikes in opposition to Russian territory. As one other latest instance, the Russian TV presenter Olga Skabeyeva, who repeatedly describes the present battle because the Third World Warfare, made particular threats with regard to the potential supply of the long-range (300-kilometre) Military Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) missile from the US to Ukraine. “Russia has each proper to defend itself. That’s to say, to strike Poland or the US’s Ramstein base in Germany, for instance.” The present narrative in Moscow is that the troubles they now face should not due to the exertions of the Ukrainians however as a result of they’re backed by the most effective Western weapons. It’s a acquainted chorus that they’re at battle with Nato.

These threats haven’t been ignored by Nato. It was decided proper at first that there can be no direct intervention by member states. That was behind their refusal to conform to Kyiv’s pleas to arrange a no-fly zone to push Russian plane from the skies over Ukraine. Biden has been clear that he doesn’t wish to give Putin an excuse to escalate, which is one cause why he has been reluctant to authorise the ATACMS deployment. One more reason is that the Pentagon is unconvinced that this could make a big distinction to Ukraine’s army efficiency.

The US has additionally sought to warn the Russians concerning the dangers related to nuclear escalation. In an interview with CBS on the finish of final week, Biden defined that turning to nuclear or different unconventional weapons would “change the face of battle in contrast to something since World Warfare II… They’ll turn into extra of a pariah on the planet than they ever have been.” He added that “relying on the extent of what they do will decide what response would happen”.

Backed right into a nook

But whereas the nuclear threats are directed in opposition to Nato international locations reasonably than Ukraine, the latter is the explanation Russia is in bother. Ukraine additionally appears to supply probably the most troubling situation. Colin H Kahl, the beneath secretary of protection for coverage, mentioned in a press release to the New York Occasions over the weekend that “Ukraine’s success on the battlefield might trigger Russia to really feel backed right into a nook, and that’s one thing we should stay aware of”. This level was bolstered by the deputy director of the CIA, David Cohen, urging to not “underestimate Putin’s adherence to his unique goal, which was to manage Ukraine” or “his threat urge for food”.

However Russia is just not really backed right into a nook. In the meanwhile there isn’t a existential risk to the Russian state, even when one is perhaps growing with respect to Putin’s private place. The way in which to get out of any nook is to cross the border again residence. And if the president needs to escalate he has different choices. To cite the New York Occasions once more: “Extra indiscriminate bombardment of Ukrainian cities, a marketing campaign to kill senior Ukrainian leaders, or an assault on provide hubs exterior Ukraine – positioned in Nato international locations like Poland and Romania – which can be channelling extraordinary portions of arms, ammunition and army gear into the nation.”

Extra is perhaps executed in opposition to important infrastructure or Ukrainian authorities buildings.

But these are all issues Putin has both executed already to a sure diploma, tried and didn’t do, or just not tried as a result of they’re too troublesome. If Russia might have interrupted the weapon provide traces coming by means of Ukraine’s western borders, it will have made no sense to attend: Russia has not been able to doing this. Attacking Poland or Romania would invoke Nato’s Article 5, which considers an assault on one member to be an assault on all. Russian leaders are nicely conscious of this as a result of they check with it typically. That is how nuclear deterrence works within the different path and retains the battle contained.

So if initiating a direct battle with Nato is just too harmful, and the worth of deterrence lies in limiting the types of help supplied to Ukraine, what about utilizing such weapons in opposition to Ukrainian targets?

There’s a view that Russian forces would possibly maintain on till the winter and recreate the sense of stalemate and mutual attrition that occurred over the summer time when the battle for Luhansk was beneath means. One other view is that Russia’s military is in a shambolic state and shall be unable to regain a grip on the scenario. Ought to the Ukrainians begin shifting in opposition to the Russian place within the Donbas area, or seize the big variety of Russian troops defending territory round Kherson and lower off from new provides, then Putin would face calamity. Within the face of such calamity would nuclear weapon use be of any worth?

Two doable roles are recognized: first, to have an effect on the course of the preventing on the bottom, and second, extra coercive, to threaten to boost the stakes to terrifying heights, together with assaults on cities, persuading the Ukrainians to surrender. To a level this second position is inherent within the first. As soon as the nuclear threshold has been handed then the obstacles to additional escalation have been diminished. How would possibly this be executed? Choices vary from an illustration shot – maybe in opposition to a big however presently uninhabited website (Snake Island has been talked about) to make the purpose {that a} course of with an unpredictable finish has been set in movement – to direct strikes in opposition to Kyiv on the different finish, with battlefield nuclear use within the center.

The issue with an illustration is that the message could also be unclear. It’ll present that Russia is able to ignore the sturdy normative prohibition on any nuclear use but remains to be cautious about taking advantage of its explosive energy. When an analogous possibility was mentioned in 1945 previous to the choice to focus on town of Hiroshima in Japan, one concern was that whereas this might present that the US had a brand new weapon of unprecedented energy, and achieve this with out killing massive numbers of individuals, until the Japanese might see its harmful results instantly it will make no impression on their management.

One other challenge was whether or not the bomb would work. It might be embarrassing to encourage the Japanese to look at after which for the spectacle to become a dud. It’s doable that this might be a non-trivial consideration in any Russian deliberations: whereas missiles are repeatedly examined this isn’t the case with their warheads. The final such check beneath the Soviet Union was through the early interval of the Chilly Warfare. As we now have seen with different weapons which were introduced out of storage, they haven’t at all times been nicely maintained and don’t essentially work as marketed.

One other resolution made in 1945 was to not warn the Japanese prematurely of what was coming. As a result of this could be a lone plane they didn’t need the Japanese to make an effort to shoot it down. Because it was, though the air-raid sirens sounded over Hiroshima, the absence of a big raiding pressure meant that it was turned off, and so many individuals had been exterior when the bomb exploded. Presumably the Russians would wish to add to the shock worth of a strike, and to scale back the dangers of it being caught by air defences, by holding it a shock. This could imply that any coercive worth must be extracted after the occasion, and used as a warning of extra to return.

What kind of occasion? It’s assumed, however who can know, that the goal can be to mix any coercive worth with a direct army worth. This is the reason the main focus is on the short-range low-yield “battlefield” weapons, generally mistakenly described as “tactical” (any nuclear use has strategic repercussions). That is the place the evaluation will get difficult.

The Russian armed forces have thought lengthy and laborious about nuclear technique. An in depth and refined examination by the analysts Michael Kofman and Anya Loukianova Fink reveals that, a minimum of in principle, the Russian army doesn’t consider that restricted nuclear use essentially results in uncontrolled escalation. The potential targets for restricted nuclear strikes are these already recognized for standard strikes – important infrastructure greater than cities. How far this could be taken as soon as the primary threshold had been handed would depend upon the opponent’s response. Russian considering on the matter, nonetheless, is geared to nice energy conflicts, and never an try and crush a supposedly weaker and smaller neighbour. Furthermore, that is the type of escalation that Putin was speaking about in his Uzbekistan press convention on 16 September, for which he doesn’t want nuclear weapons to have the specified impact.

That leaves the query of utilizing the restricted nuclear weapons to have an effect on the continuing underway battles on the bottom. It’s price noting the problems that encompass any try to make use of these as in the event that they had been regular weapons of battle. On this position they are often seen as uniquely highly effective variations of standard munitions – from bombs, depth prices, shells and mines, with the added ingredient of radiation. On this regard they’re finest employed in opposition to massive targets, for instance a gathering of troops getting ready for an offensive. The choice can be a robust defensive place. Ideally this goal can be a long way away from Russian troops. (The Individuals famously developed a nuclear gun – the Davy Crockett – which had a deadly radius larger than its vary.)

Given the character of the preventing in Ukraine, this isn’t in any respect easy. There are hardly ever massed formations working in both defence or assault. Items are typically dispersed. Think about an account (from a Russian supply) concerning the offensive in Kherson. It notes that the Ukrainians have made their influence by messing with the Russian provide traces whereas advancing not by armoured thrusts (in contrast to in Kharkiv) however as an alternative by utilizing small teams of infantry “creeping” ahead over watery floor, for that is an space lower by means of by irrigation canals. Discovering a helpful goal for nuclear use in such circumstances can be troublesome and, given how little it’d obtain, a wierd approach to begin a nuclear battle. Moscow has proven no nice take care of the populations of Luhansk and Donetsk, however as their liberation is supposedly on the coronary heart of Russian battle goals it will even be unusual to mark this by nuclear detonations.

There is no such thing as a proof for now that weapons are being moved into place or being ready for such strikes. US intelligence, which has been terribly exact thus far, will be anticipated to select up any particulars (or a minimum of the Russian would want to imagine that). No effort has been made to elucidate to the Russian public why strikes like that is perhaps obligatory. As we now have seen, Russian figures speak garrulously about eventualities for nuclear use in opposition to Nato international locations however not in opposition to Ukraine. We are able to additionally assume that neither of Putin’s latest interlocutors – Xi and Modi – can be enthused. It is a situation largely generated within the West to anticipate contingencies which have but to be reached.

It’s true that the prospect of nuclear use would possibly engender panic in Ukraine and Nato. It is usually laborious to think about that the information can be greeted calmly in Russia. It might intensify opposition in Moscow to Putin. He would after all want a compliant chain of command to implement an order to go nuclear, particularly as a part of a fancy army operation on the bottom. If the wind catches radioactive mud near the borders it might fall on Russian territory.

Even when their use did make a distinction, the elemental political drawback would nonetheless exist: the best way to pacify a hostile inhabitants with a depleted military. In the meantime, nuclear threats do serve an essential goal for Putin: by deterring extra direct Nato engagement. Ought to he use nuclear weapons in a restricted and probably futile means, the edge would nonetheless have been crossed and all bets can be off when it comes to a Nato response, which could nicely embrace doing precisely these issues Putin was making an attempt to discourage.

There’s one qualification to this evaluation, which is Crimea. This territory was seized from Ukraine in 2014 and Ukraine needs it again. Militarily this could be much more difficult than the opposite acts of “de-occupation” that Ukraine needs to realize. There are methods of constructing the Russian maintain on Crimea harder with out a army assault, and the Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky has spoken of this as an issue which may require a diplomatic answer, though if Russia reveals no real interest in a negotiated withdrawal his forces will carry on going. Fairly than fretting about some future craziness, efforts would possibly extra usefully be put into getting ready for the second when Putin realises that he has misplaced and will search to carry on to Crimea. All the problems related with ending the battle – sanctions, reparations, battle crimes, prisoner exchanges and safety ensures – would have to be addressed.

We might discover it troublesome to think about that Putin can lose, and marvel about how nicely he’ll cope along with his failed aggression, however it’s completely doable that in some unspecified time in the future he’ll run out of choices. Then the Russian president should look failure within the eye.

Lawrence Freedman is a daily contributor to the New Statesman. A model of this piece initially ran on his Substack “Remark is Freed”.

[See also: Why China won’t ditch Vladimir Putin]

Leave a Reply